Talk:Progressive Social Networks
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Progressive Social Networks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Mexican political party Progressive Social Networks allowed party members to vote in internal elections using a smartphone app? Source: https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion/inicia-redes-sociales-progresistas-proceso-de-eleccion-interna-en-urnas-electronicas
Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- The article describes Elba Esther Gordillo as corrupt, but the source doesn't seem to say that specifically. I think we need a citation for the corruption claim per WP:BLP.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
I'm a new reviewer, so would be grateful for a second opinion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: You might want to consult the lead of Elba Esther Gordillo. If it weren't that obvious, I wouldn't have put it there. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. The Forbes source cited in that article says that she was "perceived to be among the most corrupt" and had been charged (though not convicted) with embezzlement. It seems obvious to me that Gordillo is corrupt, but I think we still need to cite it in the article per WP:BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm still not sure that source works for this claim, as (outside the headline) it just says that she's perceived to be corrupt, not that she actually is corrupt. But I'll leave that subtlety to others' judgement. Otherwise the article looks good.
—Granger (talk · contribs) 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm still not sure that source works for this claim, as (outside the headline) it just says that she's perceived to be corrupt, not that she actually is corrupt. But I'll leave that subtlety to others' judgement. Otherwise the article looks good.
- @Mx. Granger: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. The Forbes source cited in that article says that she was "perceived to be among the most corrupt" and had been charged (though not convicted) with embezzlement. It seems obvious to me that Gordillo is corrupt, but I think we still need to cite it in the article per WP:BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
