 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Proguanil.
|
Improvements to Proguanil article
editStudent editors: Lois.chung, Floal1, Collierpharmd, Hwhittemore13 will be making the following improvements and edits:
Lois.chung will be addressing the "Mechanism" section. Elaborating on mechanism details.
Floal1 will be addressing the "Precautions" section. Adding information on liver precautions.
Collierpharmd will be addressing the "Introduction" section. Will be adding a bit of history, and moving other information to appropriate sections.
Hwhittemore13 will be addressing the "Medical uses" section. Elaborating on populations and uses.
Peer review: STUDENT 4
editIs there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation?
We found no apparent evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation. Hjkim1988 (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review- Student 1
editDoes the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…
Yes, throughout the article they seemed to keep a neutral point of view.
Peer review: Student 3
editPrecautions section: Recommending monitoring of certain labs may not be appropriate for Wikipedia
Medical uses section: Perhaps there can be a citation on the pricing for mefloquine vs. Proguanil
Student 2
editQuestion – Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely accessible? If not, specify…
Answer- Not all the points that were included were verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely accessible.
The following citations were not accessible at all: [2] [4] [9] [19] The following were not from secondary sources: [1]: prescribing info [5]: primary lit [8]: primary lit [14]: primary lit [17]: primary lit [18]: primary lit
MitraFazel (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Sources that were previously mentioned as inaccessible (question 2) were double checked - free PDF versions of the articles are in fact available through the website by following links on the right hand portion of the web page. Source [4] - although the full article is not available, the referenced information can be seen in the abstract, however, I still replaced the source with a more accessible, up-to-date reference.
Collierpharmd (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)