Talk:Project Z (bomber project)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
editI am finding more sites for use as sources. Can someone add them in?
- http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Nakajima:G10N.html
- http://www.j-aircraft.org/xplanes/hikoki_files/g10.htm
96.243.206.236 (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- The first link is to a copy of Wikipedia; look at the bottom: "This article is from Wikipedia licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License." The second is from a source that cannot be called reliable--it has no author, no publication information, no secondary or tertiary sources. Please see WP:RS. You should look for this kind of information in books, probably, not just on the internets. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The word wikipedia is not on the page of the first link. Look at it again -
"2 References
Ogawa, Toshihiko (1993). Nihon Kokuki Daizukan, 1910-1945, Tokyo: Kokushokankoka"
Straight from it
We already link this site for the second link. The link i gave is a more specific page.
96.243.206.236 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- I am not entirely sure what you are saying here. The word Wikipedia is on that page, at the bottom, and I cited it above. If you care to actually look, you'll see that it even links directly to the Nakajima G10N's edit page, here. Drmies (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I see what it is now, I had NoScript on. Also, the second link - The article links to that site already, but that link I posted goes to a more topic-specific page. Make sense?
96.243.206.236 (talk) 22:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- The thing is, it is not a reliable source. The reference I added I found through Google Books, not on the internet, which is full of unreliable personal sites. Drmies (talk) 05:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
We already link to that same site! Also, if you added a reference, should the "this page is unreferenced" be removed since the page DOES have a reference?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.206.236 (talk • contribs)
- The page does not give author's name nor bibliograhy and/or sources used for the article. External links rules are bit relaxed, but strictly speaking this page probably does not qualify as external link either.
- I'm not sure if one reference is enough to replace {unreferenced} template with {refimprove}.--ja_62 (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
I have seen pages with only one reference and no "unreferenced" tag.