Talk:Prolate spheroidal wave function

Latest comment: 3 years ago by DieHenkels in topic Order of material: re-written

Revision required

edit

Contrary to what the first paragraph claims, the PSWFs are not time-limited. If   were in fact time-limited, the second   in the expression   would be redundant anyway. Based on the original paper by Slepian and Pollack, and using the notation established in this article, the correct expression seems to be

 

where   are bandlimited. Perhaps somebody with more background in this matter can confirm this. Qopzm (talk) 00:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree

edit

I agree with this observation, that the PSWF's are not time limited. In fact, they are defined to be those functions which maximise the power contained the region [-T,T] given the constraint that they have unit power on R. I have constructed explicitly these functions and they do not vanish outside a compact interval. Indeed, it is a general result that a function which vanishes on a compact interval necessarily cannot have a frequency content which vanished on a compact interval. I will work on the revision to this incorrect material. angusprain 18:25, 1 March 2013.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prolate spheroidal wave function. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Order of material: re-written

edit

List of changes:

  • Headings inserted, paragraphs re-ordered in more natural way
  • Application on band-limited functions shifted to the middle
  • In that section, time interval set to  , as in NIST's Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (DLMF) §30.15 (reference added)
  • The explicit form of the band-limited eigenfunctions given in terms of angular PSWF
  • Correction: the PSWF are not time-limited, but band-limited
  • The convention for prolate coordinates modified as in the corresponding wiki page
  • Dead links to Slepian & el papers replaced by DOI
  • The eigenvalue   is fixed by the boundary values of the angular function at  , and not by the behaviour of the radial function (see DLMF §30.13)
  • References tidied up: include page numbers, bibliographic information: journal_name vol (year) page.

Further improvements:

  • Wouldn't it be useful to visualise the prolate functions? The DLMF gives simple cross sections in the coordinates   and  , but it would be great to show a true spheroid. Needs some 3D plotting.

--DieHenkels (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article was apparently drafted by the same team as the prolate functions. Similar changes appear natural, since the two sets of functions are intimately related. --DieHenkels (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply