Talk:Promenade MRT station/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 08:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: ❯❯❯ S A H A 11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)
- Pass or Fail: ❯❯❯ S A H A 11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)
Comments
edit- Paraphrasing not needed. If you want, you can.
- Remove MOS:ALLCAPS from citations and citations from lead as per WP:CITELEAD.
- Done
- I have removed the citelead. ❯❯❯ S A H A
- Link or describe "kuehs" with a note.
- Linked it and solved some minor issues. ❯❯❯ S A H A
- Change S$ to US$ using Template:To USD. Keep both currencies, like- S$ abc (US$ xyz).
- Done
- The circle line section starts with "Contract 825". Add more details to it. Same with Contract C902.
- Hmm, will just adding the context of the station will do? There isn't really much to talk about, as decisions of the station site isn't totally open to us.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- also, you can add this "C825 project" (found it from ref [8].) or just remove the contract number. only the word contract will be sufficient. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I rather keep the contract number. Contracts by LTA for a certain project have a unique number.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- also, you can add this "C825 project" (found it from ref [8].) or just remove the contract number. only the word contract will be sufficient. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, will just adding the context of the station will do? There isn't really much to talk about, as decisions of the station site isn't totally open to us.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Some citations are not properly formatted. Example - The Straits Times [17]. Add source date, author.
- Done
- Avoid using & as per MOS:&.
- Avoid one sentence para. MOS:PARA
- Add platform details for line. Like- Circle line uses Platform A/B/C.
- Only Bayfront was linked in the lead. Link the whole Bayfront station.
- Corrected it. ❯❯❯ S A H A
- Add wikilinks once. There are some repetitions.
- "Circle line Extension" E is in caps.
- Fixed
- Sorry, my bad. I meant something, and wrote something else. E won't be in caps. ❯❯❯ S A H A
- Fixed Does this have to apply to the source titles? Because that's how it is in the sources.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- ZKang123, nope. It's optional for sources (title case or sentence case). more details in MOS:ALLCAPS. ❯❯❯ S A H A
- Fixed
- Previous names not mentioned in the body.
- Done Well, I already brought up the working name, and the eventual decision on Promenade.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- "The station is located near ..." add this in the body with ref.
- Done
- Is platform B linked with circle line?
- Yes it is.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Then I would suggest swapping the platform B image with the Exit A image. ❯❯❯ S A H A 07:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Fixed
- Yes it is.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Need more station details in the body. Bicycle facilities, Platform levels.
- Can't really specify; no official sources on these. Removed some details as unsourced. Rather leave in the infobox.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Reference needed for Parking, Bicycle facilities, address.
- Done
- More details about PHUNK.
- Done Added link.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
❯❯❯ S A H A 15:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also added details on the artwork background, from a CCL AiT book.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)