Talk:Pronto Computers
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Pronto Computers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article! Hopefully you will write more articles. Have a good day!
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 13:06, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Pronto Computers' System 16 was one of the first computers in the tower form factor? Source: https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_834440
- ALT1: ... that Pronto Computers' System 16, a clone of the IBM PC, won an award in I.D. magazine for its industrial design? Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=fi4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA60
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Use (liturgy)
Created by DigitalIceAge (talk). Self-nominated at 07:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pronto Computers, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hi DigitalIceAge (talk), review follows: article created 22 January and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and is cited inline throughout to what appear to be reliable sources for the subject; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook facts are interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and check out to sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 10:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
