Talk:Prophet (Star Trek)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

First contact

>>"Captain Benjamin Sisko... became the first corporeal being to communicate with the prophets on stardate 46379"

This could be contradicted by the episode Accession.

Communication with timeless entities

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Besides the fact that it is a critical premise for the series, would it be possible for a being that exists in linear time to communicate with beings that are timeless and without any kind of understanding of linear time? (They learned about linearity form Sisko, but being timeless, would they not always know it?) Example: If a character that lived in only two dimensions(+time) met a human, how would he be able to perceive a being that has more dimensions than itself? The prophets can move freely in at least 4 dimensions (our 3+time), moving in time is to them like walking sideways for us.--Edgjerp (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the creators care for such nuances. It's a show, not science; it should be entertaining rather than accurate. So there's no point to discuss this. — Vano 13:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sheesh, didn't pay attention to the date of the original message. — Vano 13:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic