Talk:Proposed merger of Korean Air and Asiana Airlines
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Ad Orientem in topic KorFlyer88's edits
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
KorFlyer88's edits
editHi there - just adding some explanation to my edits where I've altered and removed some material added by KorFlyer88. He's also removed some of my additions without explanation. Happy to discuss anything specific if they want to add something to the article but much of the material I removed is, frankly, written very badly and was rife with grammatical errors or simply incomprehensible. I'd suggest utilizing an AI or something to correct the English before proposing additions. Avgeekamfot (talk) 04:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Regarding the date format, as the creator of the article noting that it's written in standard date format (not ISO). Per MOS:VAR, given that that's the existing style I have gone through and altered later additions for consistency. Avgeekamfot (talk) 04:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Negative. As a viewer and executive in KAL, please do not disrupte oue airlines merger status. In Korea, this is quite sensitive and we're keep monitoring this. 42.20.166.131 (talk) 23:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm assuming that KorFlyer88 is the same as the IP. I'm copying my reply to his comments elsewhere below:
- My edits do not say that reviews in Japan have been removed or rejected, they simply reference the cited fact that Japan has raised an objection. If you disagree with the source or the wording, feel free to edit that instead of simply undoing everything you dislike to add whatever material you want. I have not removed non-essential countries, I summarized them in one section with all citations maintained because they're relatively unimportant. ISO date can be written American and shouldn't be changed unless there's a compelling reason to do so, as the original creator of the page, I'm simply maintaining consistency. Editing grammar would be easier if you didn't insist on reverting everything to your preferred version.
- Finally, @Ad Orientem: could you take a look here? See you've had some back and forth with KorFlyer88 in the past and even if the IP is not actually the same user, there seems to be a conflict of interest if they are in fact an executive of the subject article. Avgeekamfot (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Avgeekamfot I am currently traveling and not online much. I would encourage you to seek assistance from another admin. Apologies for any inconvenience. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)