Talk:Protein microarray
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re Testpilot edit
editRe edits to microarrays. If you want to remove the link I posted to protein microarrays which you classified as "spam" Protein Microarrays, you might as well remove my writings in the wikipedia articles. It is really pathetic wikipedia employs people that have no idea about the topic at hand nor the websites that are posted as external links. I will take my information elsewhere as most researchers have done. Wikipedia has poor science information due to its lack of science-knowledgeable registered users.
- And please check http://www.molecularstation.com/protocol-links/Protein_Microarray_Protocols/ which was also removed by me. If someone take his time to investigate, he will see that you spammed more that 20 articles with a links to molecularstation.com . The most rediculos spamming was a link to abovementioned web site plesed on disambiguation page. The articles that got spammed include but not limited by:
Transcription (genetics) Enhancer Promoter Mammalian embryogenesis Stem cell line Stem cell Vergina Sun Bioinformatics Arabidopsis Drosophila melanogaster Caenorhabditis elegans RNA interference Small interfering RNA Peptide mass fingerprinting DNA RNA Protein Proteomics RT-PCR Complementary DNA Gene Ontology DNA microarray Splicing (genetics)
- And most of thouse links lead to simple links directories pages. Have fun. TestPilot 07:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
What you just posted was spam, you people need to get an education and stop wasting your time chasing ghosts. The page posted above has much more valuable information than the wikipedia protein microarray article.
Stick to reporting "spam" you don't understand on a free informational resource....lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.20.136.120 (talk • contribs)
- If you want to contribute content to the articles, that's encouraged. If you want to anonymously add links to an external link directory, that's spam. If you want to insult people, that's a violation of the Wikipedia:Civility policy. --Alan Au 06:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Requests
editCould we put protein binding microarray (possibly also the acronym pbm) in the article. Some people look for this specifically and come up short. Hwttdz (talk) 17:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Protein microarray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120526131321/http://microarrays.ucsd.edu:80/biogem/pdf/Talapatra%20A.pdf to http://microarrays.ucsd.edu/biogem/pdf/Talapatra%20A.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080828094957/http://arabidopsis.info/students/microarrays/techarrayconstruc.html to http://arabidopsis.info/students/microarrays/techarrayconstruc.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121224125058/http://cmbi.bjmu.cn:80/cmbidata/proteome/method/pdf/20.pdf to http://cmbi.bjmu.cn/cmbidata/proteome/method/pdf/20.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)