This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's an article here regarding Protichnites. Don't know if it's relevant enough to be included, but seeing how the article only consists of one paragraph right now... 97.104.210.67 (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The treatment of these mixed-bag trace fossils as a genus would require a type species and a generic authority. While the ICZN still recognizes such a category, many researchers treat these groupings as informal. Except for the lone mention of 'genus' in the lede, this article treats the group informally. Unless some editor wants to explain why a collection of diverse fossls is a genus, perhaps we should opt for the easy way out.--Wloveral (talk) 01:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
