This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Nearly all of this article except the introduction is identical with the article on the whole species at Douglas fir. I've started a discussion at the talk page there about how to differentiate the two. If no one with expert knowledge helps after a while, I may take a stab at it myself. Thanks! W.stanovsky (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think it is appropriate for there to be some overlap in the articles. The detailed botanical descriptions and ecological information should be on the pages specific to the varieties.