Talk:Psionics (Dungeons & Dragons)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by SilkTork in topic Psion split
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge / move
editI think this class should be moved to list of psionic Dungeons & Dragons character classes or psionics (Dungeons & Dragons) and have the psionics-related section of list of alternate Dungeons & Dragons classes merged into it. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- If it's moved to psionics (Dungeons & Dragons), I think the psionics section of spells of Dungeons & Dragons should be merged in as well. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I'd like to take this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Psionics, since it concerns several pages. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's done. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I'd like to take this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Psionics, since it concerns several pages. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Psion split
editSince Ardent now has its' own artcile, Psion is confirmed for 4th edition and all the general information on psionics is in the main psionics article, I think we should consider splitting the Psion section into its' own article, however I don't think we should risk a split until after the section has expanded and gotten some third-party citations. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Conditions for splitting not met 11/11/11 Op47 (talk) 16:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Split request tag removed. It's too soon - see WP:WHENSPLIT. Build the section, and source it before either splitting or requesting a split. SilkTork ✔Tea time 00:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)