Talk:Puddling (civil engineering)

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Puddle, not Puddling

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Unless anyone objects and can show that puddling is a noun, and also the more common name for this substance, I propose renaming this article from Puddling (engineering) to Puddle (engineering), which already appears in the puddling disambiguation page as a red link. Oosoom ^Talk to me 13:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also a common practice in the US

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Greetings Wikipedians. "Puddling" was also a common practice in the US, think the Erie and Union canals as examples. I will develop some material in the article to mention that American practices in this type of construction and the canals it was used on. Cheers . Risk Engineer (talk) 12:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic