Talk:Pui Tak Center/GA1

Pui Tak Center GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gbern3 (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I found two sentences where you need inline citations. In the lead: [1]The building was purchased by the Chinese Christian Union Church (CCUC) for $1.4 million and renamed the in 1993. Comment: You also need to specify what the building was renamed to. Also, this is not something that will hold up the article's promotion but do you really need to wikilink CCUC when the page doesn't exist? [2]In the History section: Starting this trend, the On Leong Chinese Merchants Association appealed to deed-holder and former Illinois State's Attorney Jacob J. Kern to hire architect H. J. Swanson to design a building large enough to house 15 stores, 30 apartments and office space on the 200 block of West Cermak Avenue.

   I don't normally put in-line citations in the lead. It is just a stylistic choice. But that specific sentence is used again in the body of the article, and it has a reference there! And wow, I don't know how I missed that error in the lead. I added what the building's name was changed to. As for the church link, I intended on maybe making the article one day, but it doesn't look like I'll get to it soon, so I just removed the red link for now. I also added the citation for your second sentence. --Torsodog^Talk 21:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

   I didn't catch that sentence in the body, my mistake. Thank you for making the other changes. // Gbern3 (talk) 02:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just cite those two facts (or remove the sentences altogether) and I'll be happy to promote the article. Leave a message for me on my talk page when completed.

   Fixes have been made. Changing status from "On Hold" to "Pass" and promoting the article. // Gbern3 (talk) 02:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)