Talk:Puke Ariki
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Giantflightlessbirds in topic Miss Free could probably do arithmetic
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Puke Ariki, the name for the combined library and museum in New Plymouth, New Zealand, is Māori for "hill of chiefs"?
- Puke Ariki – Giantflightlessbirds (give) (tag) – View nom subpage Source: "Translating as 'Hill of Chiefs', Puke Ariki is home to the i-SITE, a museum, a library, a cafe and Arborio restaurant" (Lonely Planet
- Reviewed: Israa al-Ghomgham
5x expanded by Giantflightlessbirds (talk). Self-nominated at 00:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC).
Article meets requirements, QPQ done, no close paraphrasing found, adequate sourcing. The only issue is that neither of the two sentences that mentions the hook fact (i.e. the "hill of chiefs" fact) has a footnote. I'm aware that the reference for that is later in the article, but DYK rules require that the sentence mentioning the fact needs a reference, even if it's already used elsewhere. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed; I've added the Lonely Planet ref to that sentence. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 02:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 | A fact from Puke Ariki appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 July 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Miss Free could probably do arithmetic
edit"The first full-time librarian, a Miss Free, was appointed in 1908 at a salary of £60 (she remained on staff for 22 years, later as Assistant Librarian, resigning in 1942).[4]"
22+1908 would be 1930, not 1942. She might have had leave in the intervening years (maternity leave in the 1910s?). I don't have access to the book in reference 4 to check. IAmNitpicking (talk) 12:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- She did indeed leave at some point in the intervening years and rejoined the library. The book wasn't precise about the dates, just the "22 years". —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 05:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)