Talk:Pure (app)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 18 November 2021 by Largoplazo. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
|
Contesting speedy deletion
editgeneral notability guideline: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvenGo (talk • contribs) 15:40, 26 November 2015
- Wikipedia doesn't carry promotionally written articles whether they are about notable topics or not! —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Multiple issues and speedy deletion proposal
editI found multiple issues in this article including covert and open advertising. I also doubt the notability of this article as it is a minor software applications for dating purposes, one of the hundreds online. Does it have to be on Wikipedia? I stopped short of proposing the deletion of this article at this time but if the issues are not resolved, I might do it later. My major concerns are: 1) Advertising - the test is very promotional starting from the first sentences 2)The notability - the links I checked, do not really prove that the company is notable and deserves a place on Wikipedia. If we approve this page, then we must accept hundreds of unnoticed applications like this. Generally, if the issues are not resolved, I propose to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Besamemucho13 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- If you check the history, you'll see that a request for speedy deletion on the grounds of promotion has already been declined. It could use more trimming and neutralizing. Probably half the "history" section is written as a snapshot of conditions at the time of writing that are of a volatile nature and certainly not true now, so that language should be removed. The only reason to delete the article would be on the grounds of a lack of notability. For that, see WP:AFD (paying mind to WP:BEFORE) on initiation of a deletion discussion. Largoplazo (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Largoplazo I am not a paid editor, but I want to improve the section about the app's history. What exactly do You advise to remove there?SKlimovych (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
COI tag (November 2021)
editEditor User:Valeriees may have a connection to the app. Largoplazo (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)