Talk:Purkinje images

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Purkinje images is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Ophthalmology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Image of "eye with Purkinje images"

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Where are the Purkinje images here? I only see the reflection of a lightbulb Platypusomelette (talk) 04:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cartooning

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Does anyone think it would be worth adding something about how Purkinje images are commonly used in cartooning of the eye, particularly in anime? TricksterWolf (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think so, but should be proceeded with caution by having inline citations from reliable sources only. Z22 (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic