Talk:Purvanchal Express
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poor reference citations
editThis article has very poor reference citations. There are only three links that point to the main pages of each site, and until I added the {{cite web}} templates, they didn't list the page names, which is needed per WP:LINKS. Furthermore, when I tested the second and third links today they did not show anything to do with any rail service anywhere in India. The link to erailinfo.in showed me a blank page, and the link to etraininfo.in redirected me to a page at the Los Angeles Times website (specifically, an article about Las Vegas). This level of referencing is, quite frankly, atrocious.
Please review the Wikipedia guidelines on reliable sources and writing citations, then help us find and add more and better source information. Thanks! Slambo (Speak) 14:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Poorvanchal Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140127003939/http://www.erailinfo.in:80/ to http://erailinfo.in/#
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)