Talk:Puss / Oh, the Guilt

Latest comment: 6 months ago by QuintusPetillius in topic US peaks

'"Puss/Oh, The Guilt" peaked at number 12 on the UK singles chart, and was deleted one week after being released.'

It was deleted? What the heck does that mean? PolarisSLBM 16:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:NirvanaGuilt.jpg

edit
 

Image:NirvanaGuilt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Remastered version

edit

As the article currently states, the remastered version of "Oh, the Guilt" that is featured on With the Lights Out does not have the lighter noises during the intro. Additionally, Kurt Cobain's vocal has a slight echo effect added to it that's not present in the original single version and the overall mix has slight reverb added to it, again, not present in the original single version. The new version is also compressed more heavily than the original single version. As a result, the original mix from 1993 actually sounds clearer.

Are these details too small to include in the article? Is the original research rule set in stone? 72.43.141.71 20:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


why has these remix changes been done? what is the justification for it? Think again adam Kasper! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.139.248 (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Puss/Oh, the Guilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Candy/Molly's Lips which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

US peaks

edit

It would be good if we could get the US chart peaks for this release which should be in CMJ magazine from February and March 1993. QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply