Talk:Pyongyang Racer/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Panini! (talk · contribs) 15:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Aaaaaaaaaand here I go. Panini!^🥪 15:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

1. Well written?: Pass, Because there isn't too much out there to "write well" in the first place.

2. Verifiable?: Pass, All sources are verified reliable and spotchecks declare they back the content thouroughly.

3. Broad in coverage?: "Broad" is a funny way to put it, but Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Stable?: I think so, but it's worth a double check to make sure.

6. Images?: Pass, both non-free images are justified for use.

Not only is the article small its a relatively obscure one. As I desparetely tried to find sources that aren't in the article so I can "AHA!" you, I came back empty. I have very little to say, actually.

Well, I wanted to make the review as easy as possible. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Gameplay

• Source 2 doesn't mention anything about the controls, so it can be moved up to the comma after "Pyeonghwa Motors"

   Done. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• Is there any information about what the stamps do? Or are they just collectibles?

  They are just collectibles and do nothing after you get them. Since you have to pass by all sights anyway, you will have all stamps when you complete the game. (Obviously, no source properly mentions this.) IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• "They further have to avoid stationary vehicles. Colliding with these three times causes the game to reset." - These two sentences are short and, since they're referencing the same detail, can be combined.

   Done. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• "There are no pedestrians." - In the vehicles, or in general?

  In general; clarified. Since several sources pointed this out, I thought I would do so as well. Do you think it is unnecessary to mention? IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

  I think what you have here is fine. If multiple people mentioned this I think its fair to include if the critics also feel its important to mention.

• What did the leaderboard keep track of? I'm assuing the time it took to complete the tour, but the details would be helpful.

   Done. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Development and release

• I'd link Pyongyang the first time it appears in this section.

  It is already linked under Gameplay and "Highlight duplicate links" tells me not to link again almost as harshly as the game's traffic police tell you to follow the road. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

  I double-checked this to make sure, because I could've sworn the counter reset after each double header. Maybe it has something to do with length? But anyways, yep, you're right.

• Looking at the Slate source, and how it credits this game's early popularity to internet culture, I would mention this detail here.

   Done. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Reception

• I got nothing. I mean, its a super small, poorly made game. Good Job!

Miscellaneous

This was easy. Too easy. Since I have nothing else to shake a stick at I might as well do random spotchecks.

• Ref 2a, b, and c: Checks out
• Ref 7a: Checks out
• Ref 14: Checks out
• Ref 15a, b, and c: Checks out

Dang it. You thought of everything.

Welp, I tried. No, seriously, I really did. I even checked the categories, and I think Category:Video games developed in North Korea is pretty unnesecary. I doubt this will even count for the WikiCup... good job, fellow editor! Resolve these and its a support from me. I'll put it On Hold for now. Panini!^🥪 16:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Panini!. I updated the article and sporadically responded above. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Yup, looks good! I'll Pass this review. Good Job! Panini!^🥪 17:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)