This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I placed the article issues tag at the top page. The basic issue is that the article is entirely sourced to the magazine itself, which is problematic since there's no way to confirm the notability of the information and it's not NPOV. All the information (other than basic facts) should be sourced to reliable, third party sources. --Mosmof (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Following talk I have added some tags to sections needing help with possible neutrality issues and added extra references and citations. Feedback and assistance would be greatly appreciated, especially as I have a possible conflict of interest with the subject matter. Thank you. Matt (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
