A fact from Qard al-Hasan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Qard al-Hasan is considered a "beautiful loan" in Islam, because the borrower is Allah and not the person who receives the loan?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@CoolieCoolster: You removed texts referenced with reliable sources and said that they are not notable! The materials in WP need not to be notable...Rather they should be verifiable and neutral and without original research (our 3 core content policy).Saff V. (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
In your first edit summary you mentioned notability as the problem and now you say the materials are not neutral. Please avoid reverting once again, unless you can clearly say what parts are not neutral and why they are not neutral. Saff V. (talk) 06:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
@HaEr48: At the Quran and in Arbic Qard al-Hasan is written in this shape (قرض الحسنة) and according to sources this quranic concept is written to Latin as "Qard al-hasan". what is the problem?Saff V. (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pinging me Saff V.. As far as I know, HaEr48's concern over the "a -a or -at sound" is right. Although the current wording is used by some reliable sources, there are some sources (such as [1], [2], [3] and etc) supporting HaEr48's raised point. --Mhhosseintalk18:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply