Talk:Qemal Stafa Stadium/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Oldelpaso in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As the nominator appears to have left Wikipedia according to their userpage, I'll keep this brief, particularly as it will need significant work in order to pass. If Brunswick Dude or any other passing editor would like more extensive comments, please ask on my talk page.

  • 1. Prose - the article needs proofreading thoroughly, it has rough edges such as grammatical errors and informal phrasing in many places.
  • 2 & 3. Referencing and original research - generally looks OK.
  • 4. Broadness of coverage - Probably the least strong area of the article. Most GA/FA articles of this type have a section about the structure and facilities of the stadium, for instance. A number of events are touched upon but not explained. What athletics events have been held there? What is the record attendance? The photo caption mentions a concert, are concerts held there regularly? How does the stadium manage to successfully host matches for three different football clubs without causing schedule clashes?
  • 5 & 6 NPOV and stability - looks OK.
  • 7. The image licensing is OK. If available, a couple more images would be useful but not essential.

Reviewer: Oldelpaso (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply