Talk:QuackShot

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:644:8D7E:6AE0:FD67:C561:AD87:19E3 in topic Quackshot
Good articleQuackShot has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2014Good article nomineeListed

Japanese title

edit

Is the japanese title really "Alive!" (アライブ, I think)? because in the japanese cover at Moby games (1, )
it reads アイラブ (airabu) ドナルドダック - グルジア王の秘宝 .

I think it translates to somemething like "I love Donald Duck - Georgia's King treasure",
could anyone with a better knowledge of japanese to confirm this?.
200.64.221.132 04:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)g_zReply

Did it last week, without reading this first.:) Should be right now, although the "I love Donald Duck" phrase appears only on the cover, not within the game.80.142.254.36 15:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Quackshot Cover Art.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Quackshot Cover Art.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Development

edit

Why is there no development section? Some information on what was going through the dev's heads is needed for the GA process's completeness criterion czar  02:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:QuackShot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 01:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this one up Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Fact tag in the infobox needs addressing
    • Done. Assuming "Fact tag" meant the "[citation needed]" next to Sega AM8, I couldn't find any sources that indicated that they played any role in developing the game, so it was removed. Disney Interactive Studios remains the sole developer of the game.
  • Per WP:LEAD, this article should not have a three-paragraph lead as it only has 6503 characters
    • Done. Two paragraphs should be good.
  • For that matter, too much of the lead is not mentioned in the article's body, with "Much of the game is patterned after the first three Indiana Jones films." and the entire second paragraph not being mentioned anywhere else. Please rectify
    • Done. I replaced the sentence that referenced Indiana Jones with a mention of the Illusion series (which *is* mentioned later). The entire second paragraph was re-written and moved down to become the short development section - I hope that's okay, since (as far as I can tell) there's not a whole lot of sources that can be used to talk about the development of the game.
  • A screenshot of the title screen is not warranted per WP:NFCC#8
    • Done. I removed it.
  • A short development section should be added. Even if there's nothing out there, you can still briefly describe the studios who developed it.
    • Done. See my response to your 3rd bullet point above.
  • "the graphics are excellent, but the game is easy to complete." Needs a source
    • Done. I added the same ref that was used for MegaTech magazine's review score (the quote is from the magazine).
  • The reception section is just a summary of Buchanan and Butt's reviews. There should be more reviews added if you can find them
    • Done, kinda. I re-wrote the Reception section to focus on the game's praise first, followed by its criticisms. The second paragraph (the game's criticisms) is still mostly a summary of Buchanan and Butt's reviews (those are the most prolific reviews I could find), though I did find a short GameTrailers review that I included in there. I think it's definitely a better Reception section than before as far as flow is concerned.

Overall I think this a promising GA nominee and will give you a week to address these points. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I did my best to address your points. Please let me know what you think! — SolarStarSpire (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on QuackShot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on QuackShot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Difficulty

edit

Game has "segments unnecessarily difficult" or was "criticized for its lack of difficulty"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.249.152.240 (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quackshot

edit

I named this game and then reviewed it for GamePro once I was fired from Sega. 2601:644:8D7E:6AE0:FD67:C561:AD87:19E3 (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply