Talk:Quadrennial Defense Review
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TGCP in topic New QDR is out
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quadrennial Defense Review article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New QDR is out
editReported on All Things Considered tonite.
Seems notable for attention to cyber-security.
--Jerzy•t 23:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Preparing for the coming QDR TGCP (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Quadrennial?
editSo, I thought quadrennial meant every four years... I'm not sure what it does mean, but whatever it means, the article doesn't explain... 70.250.198.35 (talk) 21:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- So, yeah, it does mean every four years, which means the article should be clearer about why there were QDRs in 1996, 2000, 2001, 2006, 2010. That looks like intervals of +4, +1, +5, and +4 years to me. 70.250.190.30 (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Had the same question, so added some clarification to the article. --Antheii (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)