 | Queen angelfish is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 11, 2022. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Requested move
editQueen Angelfish → Queen angelfish — Changing name to conform to WikiProject Fishes naming standards. In most cases, we should not capitalize common names. [[User:sbidny|Steven Bidny]] (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support This is a guideline of WP:FISH, it is more common, and related articles use this capitalisation, and an request may be unnecessary. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, this is unambiguous. I'll move it. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- This article has been renamed per the above move request --Stemonitis (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Photo of juvenile appreciated
editSince the juvenile and adult forms of this species are so different, a photo of the former (as a secondary photo) could be useful to most readers.
Range map
editRequesting someone make a distribution map of the species using this. Much appreciated. LittleJerry (talk) 03:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Queen angelfish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 19:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Reading now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Stating that, aside from Brazil, the species is not harvested too much in its range and the wild population appears to be stable.[1] – Sentence without noun, maybe needs to be combined with previous one.
- The bacteria Photobacterium damselae piscicida was isolated from its kidney, raising concerns that it could infect native fish.[25] – Does this mean that this bacterium (singular? bacteria is plural?) is specific for this fish, or that it is exclusively found in the western Atlantic? And, it would be ideal to have a paragraph on parasites?
- Just that they could spread the disease. And the sources don't mention parasites LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest to add that the disease was previously found to be absent in native fish in the Red Sea. This would highlight the importance of this discovery, and add necessary context. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just that they could spread the disease. And the sources don't mention parasites LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- A sentence stating if species-appropriate husbandry is even possible for pomacanthids of this size (I have read it is not).
- The sources don't say. Just that they have certain requirements. LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- They are captured mostly for the aquarium trade, where they are abundant and highly valued – Isn't "abundant" a bit too much? They reach 45 cm and don't even fit into most private aquaria?
- Removed. LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Very nice read, only few issues. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)