Talk:Queensland University Regiment

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cinderella157 in topic Questionable

Prominent former members

edit

I wonder about sourcing for this list. I knew several of those named during my time there, so I can personally vouch for them, but that's not good enough for Wikipedia. How do we find a good source(s). --Pete (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

G'day, Pete, yes I share your concerns. I actually think it might be necessary to remove it as it seems a bit indiscriminate. That said, if you are keen to try to source it, I certainly wouldn't oppose that. Some references might be found in local newspapers (if you have access to Proquest or something similar it might be possible to search for some). I think the regimental association's newsletters might also offer a source, although they aren't "third party" as such. They can be found here: [1] Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm a keen reader of the QURA newsletters, and, lacking biographies, I think that they are reasonably authoritative. It's not as if this list is under dispute or anything, I'm just concerned that we need a source for each entry. We had someone try to make some non-notable entries recently. --Pete (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Gday gents. Sorry didn't see this thread and just reverted an entry for a MAJ GEN Wayne Barclay, probably should have checked here first. Apologies. Are you able to verify if he exists / is notable? I couldn't find anything on him but am only able to do Google searches ATM as I'm on cse. Will revert myself if it can be verified of course. Thanks. Anotherclown (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
The QURA website lists a MAJ W G BARCLAY as a current mbr which might be him, although he doesn't appear to be a MAJ GEN. Thoughts? Anotherclown (talk) 11:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queensland University Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Questionable

edit

Hi, pls see "regiment lost its mortar and machine-gun platoons". At no time in the 80s or early 90s did QUR have a MG platoon. I don't know if this is an error in Paul's book or an editor error. If somebody has access to the book, it should be checked pls. QUR did not exercise its freedom of the City of Brisbane in 1986 but rather, was granted the freedom at that time. I have the parade programme and can provide a copy of the decree from that, which granted the freedom. There was a pioneer platoon. I am not certain if it was disbanded in mid 1983 or 1984. The D&E platoon (or rather - a section) was formed from its remnants. I would have to dig up my records that might confirm the date. I appreciate the requirement for reliable sources. However, a support Company two years after 1982 consisting of "mortars, signals, demonstration and employment platoons and intelligence section" might be in doubt. If this is what Paul's book says, then that is what it says. I note that none of the prominent former members currently listed are supported by citations that they were former members. I don't suggest that they should be removed (even if wiki says so) but that there are many others who are at least as prominent who aren't there - I can think of two major generals and a brigadier with a CMC (I think), just of the top of my head. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 11:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

PS My error, Smith support de Jersey. Cinderella157 (talk) 12:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply