Talk:Quezon City Reception House
This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 2 November 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus for the move did not happen during the RM listing time frame. There is support for a separate article on the building Boracay Mansion (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Quezon City Reception House → Boracay Mansion – Concise and common name. The colloquial term is much more commonly used by local media than the official name. Interaksyon, Rappler, GMA News. Similar to Coconut Palace. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Can y'all post new photographs of the Quezon City Reception House ?
Comment, technically the Boracay Mansion is different from the Quezon City Reception House as stated by some of the given sources. It happens that they both occupied the same lot at a given period of time.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Split I suggest creating a distinct article for the Boracay Mansion instead since both the demolished Boracay Mansion and the current Quezon City Reception House has notability in their own right, the former for being a key subject for President's Estrada's scandal which led to his impeachment, and the latter for its role as the office of Vice President Robredo.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose move. The current article deals almost entirely with the existing building, and is at the correct title. Agree that a separate article on the building Boracay Mansion formerly on the site is justified. Andrewa (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.