Talk:Quintonil/GA1
Latest comment: 9 hours ago by TrademarkedTWOrantula in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Snatch! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Reference section is available. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
Quickfail?
edit- Article is stable.
- Earwig top result: 24.8%. No severe copyright violations.
- No mistakes in previous GA reviews to note.
- No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
- No glaring errors.
- Comment
- @Tbhotch: I think this sentence should be moved to the Description section: "It has volcanic stone floors and wood and mirrored walls." ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 14:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)