This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seamounts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SeamountsWikipedia:WikiProject SeamountsTemplate:WikiProject SeamountsSeamounts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France
Removed "So the emerged island represent 1/32 of the total mountain from the ocean floor 4000 m under the sea level, and even 1/100 with the part sunk." because it seems to make no sense...
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot08:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
A thought about link between Chicxulub crater of 65 mya, and Reunion Hotspot.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is there a possibility these are related events, and the impact was of a scale so it caused related events in the indian ocean. (the decan trapps) I would like to toss this thought in the air and see if it makes its own helium. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.246.208 (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
If the Chicxulub impact coincided with activity in the Indian Ocean then yes it is possible that they are related. Hwever, there is a problem. The Réunion hotspot was already erupting the Deccan Traps as the earliest known lavas pre-date the impact. The date range for the traps is about 8 million years ranging from 68 to 60 million years ago, and the Chicxulub impact has been dated at about 65 million years - approximately half way through the eruptive cycle of the Deccan Traps. There is also evidence that the Cretaceous extinction was under way and that the Chixulub impact only added to an over loaded environment and may therefore have created the circumstances that caused the final extinctions.The Geologist (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply