Talk:Róbert Ilyés
Latest comment: 4 years ago by KIENGIR in topic {{{nationalteam1}}} for CONIFA teams in Template talk:Infobox football biography?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Unverified POV pushing
editSkyhighway, you ignore basic principles of WP and you continue the same POV pushing as you did by the talk page of the Székely Land national football team. The same goes here whatis there written.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- It is very verified, it's a private one not state owned, what sources to you have in order to say is financed by Romanian government? It was even initiated and started in Hungary not Romania, so it's not 'national team' but a private one who was made in Hungary. Full stop. Do you get it now or not? Skyhighway (talk) 11:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- https://kronika.ro/sport/vilagbajnoksagra-keszul-a-szekelyfoldi-focivalogatott read it Skyhighway (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? I was introducing this source that verifies my point of view. The rest of your personal contemplation including the same fallacious argumentation I won't react here, since there is already a discussion about this, as I indicated above, there is no need another place to insist the same.(KIENGIR (talk) 12:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- I see no edits of you to the article to support the fact that you admit finally that is private not state owned and is not national. Skyhighway (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- I tell you again the third time, in this context it is only important what is in the Székely Land national football team article, why I would edit anything until there is an ongoing case?(KIENGIR (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- I see that you are not willing to find a consensus. Which is bad of you. Skyhighway (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ridiculous, you don't even have an idea about this term really, and please do not reflect your activity on others and just calling me bad, because I don't support you unverified misleading edits.(KIENGIR (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- Misleading is what you support, this is not national team. You know it. Then if you finally accept the fact you should do in such a way that the article to reflect this. Skyhighway (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- So you did not understood the 4th time, that this discussion does not belong here. You really think people do not notice that now you argue and introduce a different claim that was not even under discussion and you act if the discussion would be about this? Amazing, and you accuse continously others of "misleading"...pfff(KIENGIR (talk) 08:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC))
- Misleading is what you support, this is not national team. You know it. Then if you finally accept the fact you should do in such a way that the article to reflect this. Skyhighway (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ridiculous, you don't even have an idea about this term really, and please do not reflect your activity on others and just calling me bad, because I don't support you unverified misleading edits.(KIENGIR (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- I see that you are not willing to find a consensus. Which is bad of you. Skyhighway (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- I tell you again the third time, in this context it is only important what is in the Székely Land national football team article, why I would edit anything until there is an ongoing case?(KIENGIR (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
- I see no edits of you to the article to support the fact that you admit finally that is private not state owned and is not national. Skyhighway (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? I was introducing this source that verifies my point of view. The rest of your personal contemplation including the same fallacious argumentation I won't react here, since there is already a discussion about this, as I indicated above, there is no need another place to insist the same.(KIENGIR (talk) 12:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC))
Budapest based association
editWhat do you have against this line? It's sourced and is true. Skyhighway (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
{{{nationalteam1}}} for CONIFA teams in Template talk:Infobox football biography?
editI am reluctant regarding this edit. The Székely Land football team is not a national team, but a team representing the Székely Land in Romania. It is not affiliated with FIFA or UEFA. The Székely Land football team does not look like a national team, because it only represents the Székely minority in Romania. 82.78.61.178 (talk) 07:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- I checked the discussion, see my latest edit log. Such issues has to be handled on template scheme-design level.(KIENGIR (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC))