Talk:R.I.P. (Rita Ora song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This is a childhood favourite of mine, so I take pride in reviewing it! --K. Peake 08:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Pipe Stargate to Stargate (record producers) under producers in the infobox
• Move the release stuff to a separate sentence directly after the writing and production one
• Remove wikilink on studio album
• I'm not sure about Chase & Status and Stargate being linked before their production mentions in prose since that is different from separate infobox parameters, also pipe to Stargate (record producers) instead

• Removed the links, are you fine with that? Iaof2017 (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• For the sampling part, cut down to only mention the duo by name with no wikilink and remove the release year of the single plus other intro
• Mention after the United Kingdom position that it was her second number-one on the UK Singles Chart with the wikilink
• Split the other countries into a separate sentence, also change this to mentioning it reached the top 50 in ones among others since top 100 is not notable for the lead of a song that was number one in certain regions
• Mention that the Bubbling Under Hot 100 is a Billboard chart
• Add the name of the Denmark certification organization, also this needs to be mentioned in the body like anything in the lead
• Remove "for "R.I.P."" because the term accompanying implies the music video was for the song
• Remove the United Kingdom after East London since everyone knows where the city is
• "depicts Ora and Tempah" → "depicts Ora and Tinie Tempah" because this is not his real name
• "she performed the song at several occasions," → "she performed "R.I.P." on several occasions,"
• "among other for the" → "including the award of"

Background and composition

• Same concern as before about linking to Chase & Status and Stargate before they are mentioned, also pipe to Stargate (record producers)
• The source does not actually say that it was intended for Rihanna
• "was not written for Rihanna." → "wasn't written for Rihanna." per the source's wording
• Try to add some background info, like what led to Tinie Tempah, Chase & Status or any other collaborators working on this

• Done. Iaof2017 (talk) 11:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• "Several remixes, including by" → "Several remixes, which were done by" because these are the only ones sourced
• "on 28 August." → "on 28 August 2012."
• ""R.I.P." is a" → "Musically, "R.I.P." is a"

Reception

• "garnered mixed to positive reception" → "was met with mixed to positive reviews"
• "between Ora and Tempah" → "between Ora and Tinie Tempah"
• "Rihanna-collaborating British softies."" → "Rihanna-collaborating British softies"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "wrote that "if she's" → "wrote, "If [Ora]'s"
• "our own high tops." → "our own high tops."" to end the full sentence quoted
• "stating that "it's still a" → "stating, "It's still a"
• "decryed the song's lyrics" → "decried the song's lyrics"
• "in the country." → "in the United Kingdom."
• "and similarly received a platinum certification" → "and also received a platinum certification"
• "also entered the chart in New Zealand and reached" → "also charted in New Zealand, reaching" and mention the chart by name specifically
• "In the United States," → "In the US," per MOS:US
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
• "and number 3 on" → "and number three on" per MOS:NUM
• I think the awards would be better wrote out in prose instead straight after the reviews since four is not really enough for a table

Promotion

• Retitle to Music video and promotion, as the first para is quite large
• Img looks good!
• Remove United Kingdom after East London because everyone knows where the city is
• "The video begins with" → "It begins with"
• "through a moderate-lighted surrounding," → "through a moderately-lit surrounding," to be less tedious with the following prose
• "Tempah is standing next" → "Tinie Tempah is standing next"
• "agains a dark grey setting." → "against a dark grey setting."
• "beanie collection," further" → "beanie collection", further" per MOS:QUOTE
• "and Tempah's appearance, writing that "not much goes on in the video" → "and Tinie Tempah's appearance in the video, writing that "not much goes on [...]"
• "looking exceptionally hot,"" → "looking exceptionally hot","
• "watch them be hot."" → "watch them be hot"."
• Idolator should not be italicised
• "cribbing song itself."" → "cribbing song itself"."
• "for American rapper" → "for Canadian musician" per his correct identity
• "on Late Show with David Letterman" → "on the Late Show with David Letterman"
• Pipe acoustic to Acoustic music
• Remove wikilink on MTV

Track listing

• Good

Credits and personnel

• Don't you have the necessary details to create this section?

Charts

Weekly charts

• Wikilink Euro Digital Song Sales to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT

Year-end charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Release history

• Good

See also

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks great at 25.4%!!!
• Wikilink MTV on ref 13 instead of ref 51
• Official Charts → Official Charts Company on refs 19 and 58
• WP:OVERLINK of NME on ref 17
• Pipe Capital to Capital (radio network) on ref 40 instead on ref 48
• Cite Idolator as publisher instead on ref 43
• Cite Life and Times as work/website instead and pipe to Life + Times on ref 45 per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Fix misspelling of year in ref 59's title

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went smoothly! --K. Peake 10:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

• Heyy @Kyle Peake:. Massive thanks to you for picking up this review. I believe I addressed all of your concerns. Iaof2017 (talk) 11:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, I like how you have left comments for specific issues and I did some copy editing to help out in a few areas too! --K. Peake 11:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)