This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
British rigid airships were designated in two fashions. The first had the airship number with a lower case "r" appended to designate a rigid design. This persisted through HMA NO. 25r including two, NO. 14r and 15r which were cancelled. The second nomenclature system applied to all rigid airships from R.26 through R.102. This system had the capital letter R followed by a period and then the sequential number of the airship. The numerals were sequential but there were many which were never more than design designations if at all. Others such as R.41 were contracted for but never finished or In one case (R.81) the contract was never signed. The two major gaps 41 through 79, and 82 through 99 are essentially unexplained. The last R.102 was begun at Cardington but abandoned after the crash of R.101. See: Cis Mowthorp, “Battlebags British Airships of the First World War” pages 157-158.
Mark Lincoln (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
