Talk:R42 (New York City Subway car)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

See discussion at: Category talk:New York City Subway passenger equipment

Reference for former use on the M

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"the M train uses R-42's, built in 1969 and 1970", Matthew L. Wald, New York Times, Crash on the Subway: The System, [[June 6][], 1995, page B5 --NE2 10:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Supposed "retirement"...

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If the R42s are still in service, how does it make sense to say the R179s replaced them fully to the max then? Just because NYCT took down the builder plates from the cars, does not mean they are truly "retired" for good. That is not a very good source. An actual source by the agency and whatever or whoever else is associated with them can confirm their actual retirement. The R179s right now are undergoing testing all over again and it'll take a while before they are all back in service. It is likely that the R42s (and the R32s) will remain in service even after the R179s are back in service till the R211s. Last thing the MTA needs is a car shortage. The MTA is back at square one all over again like they were following the mainline R44s' retirement. Unless we get further information sooner or later this year, we should not say that the R179s have replaced the R42s and may retire some R32s in any of the articles.

So...any thoughts to this matter? Jemorie (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Jemorie, According to the Twitter of Dan Rivoli (a transit reporter), the MTA was planning to retire the R42s until the R179 fiasco happened. Rivoli cites an unnamed source for his claim. However, I don't really trust this statement as much, since (1) this is hearsay and (2) this is not the verified Twitter account for that reporter. epicgenius (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

R42 amount in-service

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

So on the Forums, some people have stated that some R42s were transferred out of ENY. I believe 18 cars are left at ENY or something like that. Can we change the number down to 18, or will we need a source for that as well? TheThingISee28 (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

TheThingISee28, I don't think we need to mention that yet, as it is trivia. The average riders does not care where the cars were transferred to or stored. It would only be important to mention if the fleet has already been officially retired from service. And yes, we would need an accurate source to confirm that, but it should be something other than the usual Twitter, because even they don't know the full story behind the scenes with the MTA unless it goes out to the public. Jemorie (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic