Talk:RAF Skellingthorpe

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have more information to add to this article (hence the headers with nothing written underneath) and will work on it as soon as possible. --KizzyB (talk) 10:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notable personnel

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why are the guys listed notable? There's no explanation, also as a general comment, there doesn't seem to be any particualr reason for the non-standard formatting of having the surname in caps. David Underdown (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering that myself. Unless these people rate their own articles (i.e. are significant), the notable personnel section should be removed.BC_{talk to me} 06:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic