Talk:RAK Airways

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jpatokal in topic Style

Fleet / Fleet age

edit

the article is using conflicting sources - one says there's two planes and the other calculates the average age incl. two more. Please agree on one of them. Mark 84.143.163.2 (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Style

edit

This article is written like an ad. Cna someone re-write it neutrally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.229.84 (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the most egregious problems. As a side note, you are certainly allowed to make such edits yourself. The only part I hesitated in taking out was the phrase "value-for-money." The normal meaning of that term doesn't apply here. It is possible that something similar could be added if we could get a better explanation and a reliable source. That is, it makes sense for us to have a sentence that defines what it's basic target market is--the phrase seems to imply something between budget and luxury, but just wasn't clear. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Apparently they're trying to position themselves between LCCs and full-service, and I've added a Bloomberg cite saying so. Jpatokal (talk) 09:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply