Talk:RD Amross

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Given the injunction against United Launch Alliance's use of the Russian made version (the injunction was at SpaceX request due to recent US sanctions against Russia related to the Ukraine), it would be good to update and include WHY Pratt & Whitney has not, as of May 2014, produced an RD-180 engine.

I have been digging, but so far, have no answer. --cregil (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Have answer, but short on time.

Notes:

It'll cost $1B over five years, according the Pentagon. http://aviationweek.com/awin/us-rd-180-coproduction-would-cost-1-billion

My favorite space related reporter: http://www.themonitor.com/news/local/potential-spacecraft-neighbors-in-cameron-county-locked-in-firefight/article_0c279cde-d320-11e3-9620-001a4bcf6878.html#user-comment-area

Another Source to tie it together/; http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1405/01rd180injunction/

--cregil (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Injunction was lifted according to this report from Reuters on Yahoo Finance [1] which has additional information of possible use to this article, well as mentioning that William Parsons is the director of Amross (although not mentioned in Wikipedia article about him - yet). 99.170.117.163 (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Joint Venture Status

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article describes RD Amross as a joint venture between Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne and NPO Energomash. Now that Rocketdyne has been folded into Gencorp's Aerojet Rocketdyne, while Pratt & Whitney remains part of United Technologies Corporation, which company is partnered with Energomash?

This Sept. 29, 2014 article describes Amross as a joint venture between UTC and Energomash, and references Aerojet Rocketdyne separately, but I'd like to have an independent reference for that: http://www.spacenews.com/article/civil-space/42017california-house-members-urge-launch-competition — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.236.134.132 (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

See my comment in section above for link to another more recent article. 99.170.117.163 (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic