Talk:RK-55

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SReader21 in topic What are the derivatives?

Janes NWS and P-1000 Vulkan

edit

Just as a warning, the Janes NWS ref seems to have got thoroughly confused between the RK-55 and the supersonic P-1000 that is effectively an upgrade to the P-500 Bazalt (SS-N-12 'Sandbox') found on Echo II subs and Slava cruisers etc. It's the only source that thinks P-1000 has anything to do with RK-55 and all the Russian sources are unanimous in placing P-1000 on the P-500 family tree. I think I've cleaned out the confusion on this article for now, just beware in future. 82.31.15.11 (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RK-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on RK-55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

SSC-X-8 redirects here

edit

I see that SSC-X-8, redirect here to RK-55, a missile under developement in 1987. The New York times has the SSC-X-8 as a new cruise missile developed during the Obama presidency and recently deployed. Are the RK-55 and SSC-X-8 the same missile, and if not how can the redirect be removed? See link below.

[1] 86.157.215.197 (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

What are the derivatives?

edit

Are there any specific variant used by the nations who use derivatives? And is the source reliable? SReader21 (talk) 09:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply