Talk:RLM numbering system for gliders and sailplanes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RLM numbering system for gliders and sailplanes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editSorry, but I do not understand what reason should be given for the remark 'cleanup is necessary' and for the degrading valuation of 'not meeting Wikipedia quality standards'! Could perhaps the responsible for inserting that tag explain his motives? I think that Wiki could be happy if many of the unhesitatingly accepted articles would have a level like this one! Corrector 08:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the tag, he was probably referring to the list. It was badly formatted and unsourced. I agree, taggers should leave explanations when possible. It helps remove backlog. --businessman332211 05:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
i WAS HOPING THAT THIS ARTICLE WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE WHAT THE TITLE INFERS IN IT. cAN SOMEONE PLEASE CORRECT THIS BY EITHER ADDING THE CONTENT SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE OR RE-NAMING THE ARTICLE. oops caps lock.216.241.47.198 (talk) 06:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- I am confused. I editted the article to actually list what is in the title and it gets reverted as vandalism. Does that mean that all articles must have only content that is incorrect, incomplete or nonsense????Petebutt (talk) 02:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK ihave incorporated the table I wrote with the original article. Now the content reflects the title!Petebutt (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on RLM numbering system for gliders and sailplanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060213235944/http://www.lba.de:80/dokumente/zuger/04-segel.pdf to http://www2.lba.de/dokumente/zuger/04-segel.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)