Talk:RSA Factoring Challenge
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RSA Factoring Challenge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Archive page created with older discussions from before 2010
editFollowing the manual process on H:ARC, I created a new archive page for this Talk page and moved all the older discussions from before 2010, as well as an external links modified section from 2017. - Dyork (talk) 19:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Question - should RSA-129 be removed from the table?
editQuestion for other editors - should the entry for RSA-129 be removed from the table? As the note on the entry indicates: "RSA-129 was not part of the RSA Factoring Challenge, but was related to a column by Martin Gardner in Scientific American". If it had nothing to do with the "RSA Factoring Challenge", why are we including it.. other than to have it in a list of RSA numbers that have been factored?
I note that RSA-129 is included in the RSA numbers article, which I think is fine. But I don't think it should be here in THIS article as it was not actually part of the "challenge".
My recommendation would be to delete the entry for RSA-129. Comments from any other editors? - Dyork (talk) 20:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)