Talk:R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following edit has been removed

"However since the court ruled against workfare the comments regarding the human rights do not form part of the reasons for the judgement and therefore and not legally binding".^[1]

This should remain in the article because under English case law only the reasons for the judgement are legally binding. The comment about human rights not being breached would support a ruling in favor of workfare not a ruling against it. — [[[Special:Contributions/82.10.108.6|82.10.108.6]] (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)] comment added by 82.10.108.6 (talk) 15:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

^ supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0064_Judgment.pdf

Add topic

[1] supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0064_Judgment.pdf

[1]