Talk:R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet

A fact from R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the House of Lords took the unprecedented decision to set aside R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1) because of concerns a judge could have been biased?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 2) and R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 3)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

All three articles are about the same case, merely the setting aside and subsequent upholding of this original decision. The other two articles are stubs and the content is mostly covered in this article as it is. Adam (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic