This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Access to the Territorial Court judgement (at library.usask.ca) seems to be restricted, but the Court of Appeal judgement (open access at canlii.org) clarifies that Morrow heard the appeal "from the Magistrate" (i.e. by Drybones against the original conviction). Morrow "granted leave to change the plea, and, having heard the evidence on the trial de novo, [...] allowed the appeal" (italics as in the original, excluding the word 'trial'; bold mine). Perhaps a legal expert could clarify exactly what this means; it suggests to the present non-expert that de novo indicates a recapitulation of the trial, in Morrow's court, as an integral part of the appeal from the magistrate, rather than that the case was returned to the magistrate with a different plea and then (later) appealed again. This article may suggest the latter interpretation by italicising the whole phrase trial de novo, and not mentioning Morrow until the following section.
