Talk:Rabbi Naftali Riff Yeshiva
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rabbi Naftali Riff Yeshiva article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Some comments, including an idea / suggestion for some changes
editTHIS edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rabbi_Naftali_Riff_Yeshiva&diff=prev&oldid=835196373 [Recent-edit-A] appears to indicate that the robot did detect ONE "dead link", but did NOT detect the issue with the entry labeled "Education.com" ...where the web page "pointed to", does not exactly say "404" [nor "Page not found"], but it DOES say "SchoolFinder Discontinued".
(That situation was remedied somewhat, by [the first half of] THIS edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rabbi_Naftali_Riff_Yeshiva&type=revision&diff=939614310&oldid=841947226 [Recent-edit-B].)
However, the issue raised by [the second half of] the edit comment for the edit labeled "[Recent-edit-B]" is still outstanding. That issue is (namely) the fact that:
- the article still says [quote:] "The yeshiva is no longer active in Indianapolis."
while
- the NEWER (2020) entry, from the "privateschoolreview.com" web site, seems to indicate that the school is still operating ["in Indianapolis"] ... albeit with a small number of students, and perhaps it is "NOT" operating as a "rabbinical college".
(Apparently, operating as a "rabbinical college" ... is different from operating as a high-school level school ... with grades 9 through 12. [right?])
Just a couple of minor comments. The first comment above -- about [Recent-edit-A] -- is primarily just a comment about the ROBOT "InternetArchiveBot"; ... and many of you [readers] probably are already aware of that robot's strengths and weaknesses. However, the second comment above, (the one about [Recent-edit-B]) is perhaps deserving of some responses from some of the readers [if any] of this "Talk:" page. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)