Talk:Raccoon Mountain Pumped-Storage Plant

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Raccoon Mountain Pumped-Storage Plant is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Recovered energy/efficiency

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

What is the round trip efficiency of this system? --Jaded-view (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

This paper says: "PHES systems are highly efficient, capable of reaching and surpassing 80-85% round-trip efficiencies." I googled around but did not see a reliably reported figure for the efficiency of the Raccoon Mountain plant. Here's a guy who claims 80% round-trip efficiency for Raccoon Mountain, citing verbal communication with the plant engineers on-site. Note that the Francis turbine was 90% hydrodynamically efficient way back in 1848. Modern Francis turbines are over 90% efficient. Given the high efficiency of large electrical generator/motors, round trip efficiencies of 80% for pumped storage sound believable. --Teratornis (talk) 07:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Care to add something from those sources to the article? That'd be useful information for readers. Will Beback talk 07:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic