![]() | Rachel Bluwstein received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grave
editThe picture given here looks nothing like the grave today. The inscription, a quote from her poem Mineged (מנגד, opposing), appears on her new tombstone, but it's now made of marble, it has barbke benches by it, and there is a book with her poems in it. Unfortunately, I do not possess an up-to-date picture. Does anyone else possess it? 瀬人様 12:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Where was she born?
editThis article and the quote "Biography and bibliography from the Institute for the Translation of Hebrew Literature" say that she was in Vyatka.
But the article in the Hebrew Wikipedia and the Russian Encyclopedia Judaica say that she was born in Saratov.
Who is right?
I sent emails to REJ and ITHL. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- According to Uri Milshtein, a relative, in "Dodati Rachel" (my aunt Rachel), which I have in the book "Rachel" ed. Uri Milshtein, 1993, by she was born in Saratov. AllenHansen (talk) 01:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Pronunciation
editI am adding Hebrew pronunciations, but they should be checked, especially for המשוררת. The pointings are taken from the entry for poet in Zilberman: מְשׂוֹרֵר[1], which does not have the feminine form or, of course, the prefixed article -ה.
There should also be a pronunciation for "Bluwstein". What does one do with ⟨uw⟩, outside of Dutch?[2]
References
- ^ Zilberman, Shimon (1999). The Compact Up-to-Date English-Hebrew Hebrew-English Dictionary. Jerusalem: Zilberman. pp. E-H 216, H-E 179. ISBN 9652227781.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Dutch orthography § Sound to spelling correspondences
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rachel Bluwstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050903020024/http://www.ithl.org.il/author_info.asp?id=207 to http://www.ithl.org.il/author_info.asp?id=207
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050903020024/http://www.ithl.org.il/author_info.asp?id=207 to http://www.ithl.org.il/author_info.asp?id=207
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
POV tag
editThe POV tag was justified by User:Sakiv, who put it, by the claim that the article 'contains emotional and praising content'. However, praising assertions are not problematic as long as they are sourced, and as far as I can see, they are. The content may give rise to emotions, but that is neither problematic nor avoidable for a Wikipedia article either - the question is whether the article expresses these emotions in an authorial/editorial voice, and I haven't noticed such a thing. Maybe there are some sentences that I haven't noticed do contain unsourced praise or first-person emotions, but it should be easy to reword them instead of keeping a tag on the whole article, and they should be identified by the editor who sees a problem with the article. All in all, I don't see a reason for the POV tag. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)