Talk:Racism by country
This article was nominated for deletion on December 30, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a global map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
we need to make pages for more countries on this topic.
editREAD THIS
editYou idiots on wikipedia need to stop arguing over the israel page and start focusing on the smaller countries around the world. Get the administrators and others in here so that you can actually do something you could've done FIVE YEARS AGO in adding info about countries nobody seems to know or care about. If you spent as much time editing countries like loas or nigeria as you did fooling with the US and Israel instead of locking them and moving on, you could've been the first on this site to complete the racism by country page. Sincerely, an American. I do apoligize for any sense I make among wikipedians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.171.6.150 (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Um...
editThere's nothing here. Should we pare down this version or this version in order to present relevant links and information? Honestly. groupuscule (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Someone distroyed the whole article. 78.8.181.112 (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Since your last revision of this article, almost all of the article's content has been removed. Should this content be restored? Jarble (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Restoring the fuller version then. ~~
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Racism by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041227005600/http://web.amnesty.org:80/library/index/engACT400202001 to http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engACT400202001
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
No such thing as a map of least tolerant countries
editI have removed the link to the Washington Post article "World’s most and least racially tolerant countries". The article headline is misleading, as the article makes clear that the data from the World Values Survey is raw. The Survey was not designed to estimate racial tolerance, and the article shows that there are many reasons to not take the data seriously. There is something highly questionable about the result for India, given it is 40% even though the country having no history of racial tension, as usually understood, and all surrounding countries under 10% for no obvious reason. For the record, I have no connection with India. See also Saidmen's blog [1] Travelmite (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)