Talk:Radon mitigation

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 37.111.247.151 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

There seems to be some oddness on this page. In the middle it seems to become about indoor air humidity which seems significantly out of place given the adjacent content.

"Modern energy-efficient construction that conserves energy by making homes airtight often exacerbates the risk of radon exposure. Less tightly constructed homes with greater air leaks are often just as likely to present elevated risks." This is a contradiction. Which one is it? The vague qualifier "often" is used in both cases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.176.242 (talk) 20:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hellodearsir❤️❤️ 37.111.247.151 (talk) 04:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This article is poorly written and hugely redundant. The two main sections have significant repetitions. There is a long, poorly motivated discussion about humidity in the first section. There are many uncited claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.176.242 (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Yes! I agree with the previous commentator. As it stands, this article is rubbish. It also needs a discussion of problems associated with radon mitigation. My house has a system which involves sealing the sump. My impression is that either the operation of the sump pump, or the operation of the exhaust fan, or possibly both, creates a vacuum which sucks in water from the surrounding soil. pmr (talk) 09:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Needs to be replaced as it is totally out of balance discussing problems of South Florida and humidity ... no explanation of motive for mitigation i.e., lung cancer. No explanation of links to alpha emissions and ties to threshold physical quantities. Nothing on extent of concerns worldwide and corresponding activity in regions. Grc55 (talk) 21:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Radon mitigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Radon mitigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply