Talk:Radu Stanca

Untitled

Contested speedy deletion request. Looks like ro:Radu Stanca relevant. Speedy deletion requester gave no reason why Radu Stanca is clearly irrelevant. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Can you indicate more specifically, in the article if possible. just why Radu Stanca is important or significant? Currently the articel says that he was a member of a movement, but not what he specifically did. it also says that he was an author, but not what he wrote nor what its reception or popularity or effects were. The ro article is longer, but I can not read it, and it appears to be unreferenced (or at least to have no inline citations) in any case. I am not deleting this at the moment, but I am not declining the speedy either. Technically it qualifies for deletion at the moment. DES ^(talk) 03:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Found some more informations and references and added them. More references and content should be found at [1]. This should be enough content now to keep the article. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

By the way, the speedy deletion request is already removed here [2]. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)