This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Radziwiłł is not a Polish name, it's a Lithuanian family. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is doesn't make all people that lived there ethnically Polish or ethnically English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.41.117 (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What does UNESCO have to do with this? No source or citation is given. If the MS is under UNESCO protection, that should be stated, with full details. Otherwise, UNESCO is hardly an authority here, and should be dropped. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Great miniatures - well done whoever got them for us. But, could we please have them properly cited? Manuscript miniatures should be cited with the folio number, for example 123r or 321v. (r for recto, v for verso). And one of the three miniatures does not yet have a caption saying what it shows - somebody lying dying I think... please complete this. Potentially this article could be very nice. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply